Day One of the Chief of Army Symposium 2025 is now available to watch!
This year's Chief of Army Symposium (CAS) was held across three historic locations in Canberra over 26-27 August.
The Symposium is a significant event in the Army’s annual calendar, serving as an opportunity to gather, reflect, engage, and analyse. This year's theme was "Army in Society", and inspired Defence leaders and esteemed academics to lead sessions that delved into our deep connection and relationship with the society we serve.
You can view all the presentations and panel discussions from Day 1 below.
CAS 2025 Opening
Master of Ceremonies: Brigadier Michelle Campbell, AM
Director General Workforce Integration, Australian Army
Welcome to Country
Opening Address: Army in Society
Lieutenant General Simon Stuart, AO, DSC
Chief of the Australian Army
Keogh Chair Address
Professor Risa Brooks
Keogh Chair and Allis Chalmers Professor of Political Science at Marquette University
Keynote Address
Professor Peter Dean
General Sir Francis Hassett Chair of Military Studies, Australian Defence College
Panel Session: The Modern Army in Society
Moderated by Professor Peter Dean, General Sir Francis Hassett Chair of Military Studies, Australian Defence College
Lieutenant General Simon Stuart, AO, DSC, Chief of the Australian Army
Professor Risa Brooks, Keogh Chair and Allis Chalmers Professor of Political Science at Marquette University
Dr Evan Laksmana, Shangri-La Dialogue Senior Fellow and Editor of the Asia-Pacific Regional Security Assessment at the International Institute for Strategic Studies
The Indo-Pacific Perspective
A Conversation with:
Dr Evan Laksmana, Shangri-La Dialogue Senior Fellow and Editor of the Asia-Pacific Regional Security Assessment at the International Institute for Strategic Studies
Dr Natalie Sambhi, Senior Policy Fellow, Asia Society Australia
The Army, Trust and National Resilience
A Conversation with:
LTGEN Peter Leahy, AC (Retd), Director of the National Security Institute, University of Canberra and former Chief of the Australian Army
Tony Jones, Journalist, Radio & Television Presenter and Writer
The Army, Society and National Memory
A Conversation with:
Matt Anderson, PSM, Director of the Australian War Memorial
Tony Jones, Journalist, Radio & Television Presenter and Writer
Panel Session: The Future of Societal-Military Relations
Moderated by Professor Rory Medcalf, AM Head of National Security College, Australian National University
Lieutenant General Simon Stuart, AO, DSC, Chief of the Australian Army
Professor Sir Lawrence Freedman, KCMG, Emeritus Professor of War Studies, King’s College London
Professor Sir Hew Strachan, CVO, FBA, FRSE, Professor of International Relations, University of St Andrews
In the 'The Future of Societal-Military Relations' Panel, with Professor Rory Medcalf, he poses a question at the 55~ minute mark:
(paraphrased)
"how do we reconcile the dichotomy between preparing the population immediately for a transformed world, national service, rapid social mobilization on the one hand, and on the other hand, seeing a lack of awareness, or expectation from society, that a small professional government apparatus will take care of all eventualities"
Transparency.
This answer, to me, seems obvious, as one who is acutely aware, and personally grappling with the same issue, from a point of view that is not carrying the same debt that your institutions know yourselves by, must abide, or metabolize.
Transparency in conversations about what "the West" stands for, and a continual rigorous conversation about what drives those who "stand" otherwise inclined.
Is it enough to believe in freedom? how deep will complexes like Anduril and Palantir need to peer into the patterns of a population to anticipate what emerges? how much of the authoritarian playbook can you build around the west under the veil of private sector shells? what determines what remains current as "currency" in this flux of nuts bolts environment and organism? for the failures in onboarding and inspiring movements to revitalize the spirit of it, how much corruption and distortion will be necessary in order to make up for the lack of engagement from the economic industrial base? how can any of this game be justified if it is a billion people now and two billion tomorrow, where we subject factory farms to imprisonment and torture of entire species and lineages, ever expanding, because our felt meaning demands ever expanding industrial base to contend with an "adversary" who does the same?
The great powers are not enemies, they are scarred memory complexes, who are yet unknown to themselves, born of a failure in bearing, and now more importantly, clash in a resultant failure of communication.
Everyone who would suggest themselves author in this space, who would inspire movement or change, will only be heard if bearing scars from discussing the evolution of the human identity in the global arena of all eschatologies, and the West most of all, holds the responsibility of managing what emerges next, with advancing technology, access to information, evolution of ideas, and genetic engineering; never has there been more capacity for shamanic expansion than now, and never has there been more capable surveillance to make it insecure, is it probably for the best? most will maintain the control group in this experiment.
So, how do you cultivate trust? it's not about onboarding people through modules that outline enemies to prepare for, it's about honesty, starkly and relentlessly illuminating all aspects of your own paradigm, all paradigms that inspire you, and all paradigms that incentivize you.
The task at hand, to my mind, is to know all uninvited attempts at shaping our minds.
And when i see governments and militaries have honest open conversations about how humans are programmed, I will know them as allies, at the next frontier.
(Obviously corruption and accountability is a very nuanced topic with regard to military and black operations, but there is far more distortion than necessary in our institutions, and if people knew them more intimately, an adversary would have a much harder time dividing us, though i doubt that all "western" leaders are interested in fueling "unities" at this point, given the opportunity to rise up against conscription etc (it's complicated, I have a lot more to say but this was just an initial intuition I had while watching, thanks for reading))