What is PME?
In 2016, the Chief of Army commissioned the Ryan Review into Army education, training and doctrine. Subsequently, Chief of Army Directive 22-17 Implementation of Army’s PME Strategy was introduced along with the paper – Evolving an Intellectual Edge: Professional Military Education for the Australian Army.
The Directive defined PME as ‘intellectual, moral and social instruction in the profession of arms’, and Professional Development (PD) as ‘the pursuit of professional mastery through the guided conduct of education, training and experience’.
The PME strategy spoke of the need to balance investment in training, professional education and experience. It defined the distinct separation between training – which provides a suite of individual and collective military skills; and education – which provides the intellectual, conceptual and ethical foundations to practically apply these skills and to successfully adapt them to a given theatre in a given character of war.
It concluded that PME would become a critical capability for the pursuit of professional mastery by developing holistic fighting power, not just a single component. It also noted that there should always be a ‘careful balance between the warrior and the scholar’ and that education must be articulated as a means to a warfighting end, not an end itself.
What you should focus on
A good place to start when creating unit PME is with the seven pillars of the profession of arms outlined in the ‘Evolving and Intellectual Edge’ paper. They are:
- Technical and tactical mastery
- Physical mastery
- Psychological and cognitive mastery
- Mastery of military history and organisational theory
- Mastery of leadership and ethics
- Mastery of operational art
- Mastery of strategic thinking
Army’s PME strategy states that PME should aim to contribute to the development of mastery of these pillars. Therefore, before you commence planning PME, you should identify if the activity will contribute to one or more of these pillars. While it should be noted that military history plays an acutely important role in the conduct of PME, it isn’t the only type of PME that can be conducted.
Further, PME works best when its relevance is directly connected to the audience’s specific role or function. When the audience can directly relate to the content and understand its applicability to their role, their attention span will increase. Very few of us are able to learn effectively without having an imperative to do so. This also relates back to the ‘careful balance between the warrior and the scholar’. Without a warfighting end, PME serves no purpose other than to make military historians out of each of us.
Ways to conduct PME
PME can be conducted in a broad variety of ways so don’t limit yourself to the standard discussion on military history or book review. Diversity in your PME program allows you to cater for all types of learners, keep your audience interested, and generate creativity. It also allows you to educate yourself and your staff on a broad range of subjects, all of which should contribute to professional mastery. Some examples of ways to conduct PME include:
- Military tours of historic battlefields (physical or virtual)
- Reading and discussion
- Delivery of presentations
- Question and answer sessions of SMEs (leadership, history, education, resilience)
- Essays
- Debates
- Verbal Briefs
- Written Reports
How to create and conduct PME
When you create PME it’s important that you conduct any necessary research prior to the session and plan how you will deliver and lead any discussion or debate. A basic PME Session Plan on a Page is attached to this article as a starting point, as well as an example plan. In addition, here are some basic steps for planning and conducting PME:
- Decide on your method of conducting PME
- Research and prepare
- Provide pre-reading or pre-content to engage people’s thinking and provide them with a foundation understanding of the content
- Lead the delivery of PME content or review submissions
- Guide the audience and control the pace of the PME, or provide feedback on submissions
- Finalise and reflect on what has been learnt and what the audience will take forward.
Importance of quick and efficient PME
Short, sharp and to the point PME maintains interest and ensures key objectives are met in the shortest possible time. With limited time in each of our schedules it is important that we are creating efficient PME sessions without over-simplifying the subject being covered. The best way to ensure this happens is to prepare yourself well so you can effectively lead the session, prepare the audience well so they come to the session with a good foundation level of knowledge, and encourage divergent thought from different points of view regardless of the delivery method. It’s also important to guide and control the pace of the session to ensure it stays on track to meet the objective. Be efficient but don’t limit yourself to a specific time limit. PME can continue on after you leave the Mess and any debate that is generated in a PME session should continue to generate discussion throughout the remainder of the week.
Want something ready-made?
Try our existing PME sessions ready to be pulled 'off the shelf' and used in units:
- Quick Military Education series – For JNCOs and soldiers
- Junior Officer PME series – For junior officers
Or create your own
Here is a pdf version of a basic PME Session Plan on a Page to act as a starting point.
PME Session Plan on a Page |
||||||
PME Type: (highlight/circle) |
Discussion |
Presentation |
Essay |
Debate |
||
Verbal Brief |
Written Report |
CONOPS |
|
|||
Title: |
||||||
|
||||||
Pillar/s of Profession of Arms covered: |
||||||
Technical and tactical mastery |
Psychological and cognitive mastery |
|||||
Physical mastery |
Mastery of military history and organisational theory |
|||||
Mastery of operational art |
Mastery of leadership and ethics |
|||||
Mastery of strategic thinking |
|
|||||
Intended Outcome: |
||||||
|
||||||
Pre Reading (insert links or book titles with page numbers): |
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
Focus Areas: |
||||||
Leadership |
Ethics |
Manoeuvre |
Tactics |
Doctrine |
||
History |
Logistics |
Physical |
Thinking |
Organisation |
||
Management |
Command |
Strategy |
Technical |
Art of War |
||
Science of War |
STEM |
People |
Projects |
Education |
||
Future Warfare |
Training |
LOAC |
|
|
||
Questions/discussion points: |
||||||
1. |
|
|||||
2. |
|
|||||
3. |
|
|||||
4. |
|
|||||
5. |
|
|||||
6. |
|
|||||
7. |
|
|||||
8. |
|
|||||
9. |
|
|||||
10. |
|
|||||
Thoughts to create discussion (if required): |
||||||
1. |
|
|||||
2. |
|
|||||
3. |
|
|||||
4. |
|
|||||
5. |
|
|||||
Conclusion and PME Outcome: |
||||||
|
||||||
Example PME Plan:
PME Session Plan on a Page |
||||||
PME Type: (highlight/circle) |
Discussion |
Presentation |
Essay |
Debate |
||
Verbal Brief |
Written Report |
CONOPS |
|
|||
Title: |
||||||
What does leadership mean to you? |
||||||
Pillar/s of Profession of Arms covered: |
||||||
Technical and tactical mastery |
Psychological and cognitive mastery |
|||||
Physical mastery |
Mastery of military history and organisational theory |
|||||
Mastery of operational art |
Mastery of leadership and ethics |
|||||
Mastery of strategic thinking |
|
|||||
Intended Outcome: |
||||||
Understanding of what leadership is and some of the complexities leading in the modern military. |
||||||
Pre Reading (insert links or book titles with page numbers): |
||||||
All |
||||||
Entire podcast |
||||||
Leadership in the Profession of Arms | The Cove (army.gov.au) |
Pages 13-15 |
|||||
Chapter 1 |
||||||
Fake It Till You Make It - Authentic Leadership | The Cove (army.gov.au) |
All |
|||||
Focus Areas: |
||||||
Leadership |
Ethics |
Manoeuvre |
Tactics |
Doctrine |
||
History |
Logistics |
Physical |
Thinking |
Organisation |
||
Management |
Command |
Strategy |
Technical |
Art of War |
||
Science of War |
STEM |
People |
Projects |
Education |
||
Future Warfare |
Training |
|
|
|
||
Questions/discussion points: |
||||||
1. |
What do you think authentic leadership is? |
|||||
2. |
What did you think about the article about faking your leadership until you make it? |
|||||
3. |
Do you think there is benefit in adopting leadership styles that are different to your natural style? |
|||||
4. |
How important do you think leadership is within the profession of arms and can you counter weaknesses in leadership with strengths in other areas? |
|||||
5. |
Do you think it’s more or less difficult to command now compared with other eras? |
|||||
6. |
Which of the 11 tips in the ‘Leadership-Are you there yet’ article were most beneficial to you? |
|||||
7. |
What are some of the keys points that you discovered when reviewing the Canadian Leadership Doctrine? |
|||||
8. |
How important is trust when leading? |
|||||
9. |
What type of leadership style do you think you have? List 3 strengths and 3 weaknesses in the way you lead. |
|||||
10. |
|
|||||
Thoughts to create discussion (if required): |
||||||
1. |
Encourage group discussion debating authentic versus fake leadership styles. |
|||||
2. |
Encourage thought within the group as to the complexities of leading in the modern military versus WW1, WW2 and peacetime. |
|||||
3. |
Encourage the group to acknowledge the strengths and weaknesses of their own leadership style and the way they lead. |
|||||
4. |
Encourage critical reflective thinking to have a deeper level of understanding of their own leadership characteristics. |
|||||
5. |
|
|||||
Conclusion and PME Outcome: |
||||||
Sound understanding of what leadership is, how it changes over time and the complexities of modern leadership. Each individual has critically analysed their own leadership style and has an understanding of how to adjust their leadership style while maintaining authenticity.
|
||||||